In this model, Nef and Ii compete for binding to AP-2. In support of this model, Nef decreased the rate of internalization of Ii from the cell surface. The AP-binding dileucine motif in Nef, ENTSLL165, was necessary and sufficient for the upregulation of Ii. In addition, two leucine-based AP-binding motifs in the Ii cytoplasmic tail, DDQRDLI(8) and EQLPML(17), were critical for the efficient upregulation of Ii by Nef. Experiments using Nef variants in which the native dileucine-based sorting motif was replaced with similar motifs from cellular

transmembrane see more proteins allowed modulation of AP-binding specificity. Analysis of these variants suggested that the binding of Nef to AP-2 is sufficient to upregulate Ii at the plasma membrane. Finally, interference

with the expression of AP-2 caused an upregulation of www.selleckchem.com/products/8-bromo-camp.html li at the plasma membrane, and this decreased the effect of Nef. These data indicate that Nef usurps AP-2 complexes to dysregulate Ii trafficking and potentially interfere with antigen presentation in the context of MHC-II.”
“Predator odor fear conditioning involves the use of a natural unconditioned stimulus, as opposed to aversive electric foot-shock, to obtain novel information on the neural circuitry associated with emotional learning and memory. Researchers are beginning to identify brain sites associated with conditioned contextual fear such as the ventral anterior olfactory nucleus, dorsal premammillary nucleus, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, cuneiform nucleus, and locus coeruleus. In addition, a few studies have reported an involvement of the basolateral and medial nucleus of the amygdala and hippocampus in fear conditioning. However, several important issues concerning the effectiveness of different predator odor unconditioned stimuli to produce fear conditioning, the precise role of brain nuclei in fear conditioning, and the general relation between the current predator odor and the traditional electric foot-shock fear conditioning procedures remain to be satisfactorily addressed. This review discusses the major

behavioral results in selleck products the current predator odor fear conditioning literature and introduces two novel contextual and auditory fear conditioning models using cat odor. The new models provide critical information on the acquisition of conditioned fear behavior during training and the expression of conditioned responses in the retention test. Future studies adopting fear conditioning procedures that incorporate measures of both unconditioned and conditioned responses during training may lead to broad insights into predator odor fear conditioning and identify specific brain nuclei mediating conditioned stimulus-predator odor unconditioned stimulus associations. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.