Results: Overall incidence of anastomotic leaks was 4.5%. Leakage rate in SMA was 2.17% versus 4.88% in HSA (p = 0.587).

Dilatation occurred in 30% of SMA and 61% of HSA (p < 0.001), 15% and 49% respectively needing ≥ 3 dilatations (p < 0.001). Both groups demonstrate an initial increase of dysphagia score, being steeper for patients with HSA (mean score 31 versus 26). Dysphagia subscales revealed at 3 months Apoptosis inhibitor higher mean scores for solids (HSA 38 and SMA 31) than for semi-solids (HSA30 and SMA 20) and for liquids (HSA 25 and SMA 26). Dichotomized results in symptomatic/asymptomatic showed a significant higher percentage of HSA patients (33%) being symptomatic for difficulties swallowing solids compared to SMA patients (22%). HSA-patients also had a significant higher score for swallowing saliva (30 versus 20). Past 3 months no more significant differences were seen except for reflux at 1 year being 27% in HSA versus 16% for SMA. Patients in both groups gave a similar global HRQL score at all timepoints. Conclusion: Semimechanical-anastomosis results in better dysphagia scores for solids and semisolids and reduces significantly the need for dilatations, in particular repeat dilatations. The negative effect of dysphagia in the HAS group fades out over time, probably due to the treatment, i. c. dilatations. Semimechanical-anastomosis TSA HDAC cost can be safely used after gastric tubulisation

allowing thus resection of the lesser curvature, an important oncologic principle for distal half tumours. Key Word(s): 1. Esophageal Cancer; 2. Surgery; 3. MCE公司 Quality of Life; Presenting Author: TONI LERUT Additional Authors: PHILIPPE NAFTEUX, JOHNNY MOONS, HANS VAN VEER, WILLY COOSEMANS, GEORGES DECKER, PAUL DELEYN Corresponding Author: PHILIPPE NAFTEUX Affiliations: University Hospital Leuven Objective: The current (7th) International Union Against Cancer (UICC) pN staging system is based on the number of positive lymph nodes but does not take into consideration characteristics of the metastatic lymph nodes itself. Although it is well known that depth of penetration of the primary carcinoma into the oesophageal wall (T)

is an important prognostic factor, little has been published about the prognostic impact of tumor penetration of the lymph node capsule in metastatic lymph nodes, which also called as extracapsular lymph node involvement. The aim of the current study was to examine the prognostic value of extracapsular (EC-LNI) and intracapsular (IC-LNI) lymph node involvement in esophageal cancer. Methods: From 2000–2010, 499 adenocarcinoma patients with primary R0-resectionwere retrieved from our prospective database. The number of resected lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes and number of EC-LNI/IC-LNI were determined. Extracapsular spread was defined as infiltration of cancer cells beyond the capsule of the positive lymph node. Results: Two hundred and eighteen (43%) Key Word(s): 1. Esophageal cancer; 2.