Time on the waiting list was similar between groups. A similar proportion of Aboriginals and Caucasians had at least one potential donor (40% vs. 46%), and the rate of donor exclusion for medical reasons was also similar (23% vs. 21%). Potential donors to Aboriginals were more likely to be excluded for non-medical reasons (50% vs. 30%; p < 0.0001), find more of which 96% were because of loss of contact. Waitlisted Aboriginal
ESRD patients appear just as likely as Caucasians to have potential living donors initiate evaluation and have a similar rate of donor exclusion because of medical reasons. Further work is required to identify why donors to Aboriginals are more likely to withdraw from the evaluation process.”
“PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between the achieved refractive change and the change in simulated keratometry (K) after myopic laser situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and compare this relationship between custom and conventional treatments.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University
of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, and John A Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
METHODS: The change in simulated K and the refractive change induced by custom myopic LASIK and conventional LASIK were determined. The relationship between the variables was analyzed by regression methods
RESULTS: Custom treatment was performed in 106 eyes and conventional treatment in 224 eyes Simple www.selleckchem.com/products/XL880(GSK1363089,EXEL-2880).html linear regression analysis did not fit the clinical observation when the refractive change was less than 2 00 diopters (D) of myopic correction with both treatments Under the linear model and nonlinear model, each unit of refractive change yielded a greater change in corneal topographic power selleck with custom treatment than with conventional treatment With both treatments, the rate of change in simulated K was not constant and was much more variable with lower amounts of correction. The relationship was more constant and linear with larger amounts of refractive correction.
CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between the measured change in simulated K and the induced refractive change better fit
a nonlinear relationship with smaller amounts of refractive correction in custom LASIK and conventional LASIK Under all forms of analysis, custom treatments yielded a greater per-unit change in corneal curvature than conventional treatments, especially for refractive corrections of 4 00 D and higher
Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36.1550-1555 (C) 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS”
“We applied the first-principles method with empirical Hubbard U parameters to study the magnetism of Zn0.75Cr0.25S with the varied doping configurations. Depending on the doping configurations, calculations using generalized gradient approximation (GGA) methods with and without U were compared to study the electronic structure and magnetic properties of Zn0.75Cr0.25S.